In the turbulence of a world often marked by instability, war, and migration, the experience of leaving one’s homeland becomes a profound psychological journey. From a psychoanalytic perspective, this transition is more than a geographical move; it is an interplay of identity, loss, and adaptation.

Home is more than a physical space; it is a repository of memories, cultural symbols, and emotional attachments. When we leave, willingly or not, we carry an internalized version of that home within us. Yet, this “internal home” can become a battleground for conflicting emotions: nostalgia for what was left behind versus relief or hope for what lies ahead.
D.W. Winnicott’s concept of the “holding environment” comes to mind here. A good-enough environment—be it family, community, or cultural setting—offers stability and nurtures growth. Leaving this space abruptly fractures that holding. The loss feels not only external but internal, leaving a void that can be difficult to articulate.
Living as an expat often means existing in a state of in-betweenness. You may find yourself longing for home while simultaneously resenting the constraints it once imposed. On the other hand, you might embrace the opportunities of your new setting while mourning the parts of yourself that feel out of place in this foreign context. This ambivalence mirrors the process of mourning described by Freud: a struggle to reconcile attachment to the past with the necessity of letting go.
Identity also becomes fluid. In your homeland, you were rooted within a shared culture and collective memory. Abroad, you may find yourself reassembling your identity through new experiences while still clinging to the pieces of your past self. This duality can foster creativity but also feelings of fragmentation. Change—even when forced or painful—can be transformative. It disrupts the status quo, compelling us to question who we are and what we value. Forced displacement also activates our defense mechanisms. Some may retreat into denial or idealization of the past, while others might over-identify with their new environment, attempting to erase the pain of dislocation. Neither extreme offers a path to true integration. Instead, therapy encourages us to engage with the discomfort, to sit with the contradictions and gradually weave them into a cohesive narrative.
For those displaced by war or forced migration, navigating life as an expat begins with acknowledging the losses—both tangible and intangible—that come with leaving home. Mourning the familiar, such as the smell of a childhood street or the rhythm of a native language, is vital to emotional processing. Creating transitional spaces can ease this process; rituals or objects that connect past and present, like cooking a traditional recipe in a new setting, help maintain continuity. Embracing new narratives allows expatriates to see their dual identity not as a conflict but as an opportunity for growth, fostering creativity and empathy. Finally, seeking support through social networking or therapy provides a space to process these experiences, transforming raw emotions into insights that promote integration and resilience.
To be caught between two places is, paradoxically, to live fully in the tension of life itself. As expats, we navigate not only physical distances but also the emotional terrain of loss, identity, and transformation. By engaging with these experiences, we can turn dislocation into a journey of self-discovery—one that enriches not only ourselves but the communities we touch, both near and far.
Leave a comment